This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.
Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.
Allocation of assets
-
Opinion Letter 76-94
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 76-94 July 28, 1976 RE FERENCE: [*1] 404 4(a) Allocation of Assets. Requirement of Following Statutory Allocation Provisions OP INION: Th is is in response to your lett er and subsequent phone conversation with Mr. Anderson of my staff, concerningthe rights o f a participant of the Country Belle Cooperative Farmers Salaried Retirement Plan (the "Plan"). As we underst and the pertinent facts, the participant had certain vested benefits under the Plan when he ter minatedhis em ployment in 1969. However, this participant contested the plan administrator's determination of t he amount ofhis vested benefit and the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (the "Court"), in a judgment entere d on Decem ber 27, 1974, decided the amount of his benefit. A termin ation no tice has been filed with thisCorporat ion proposi ng a termination date for the Plan of July 11, 1975. The participant's benefit has not yet been paid.In vie w of the above, you aske d our opinion of the priority of plan asset allocation for this part icipant's benefit. Anyben efit which s hould have been in pay stat us before the plan termination date, but which has not been paid prior to suchdate, is a pre-t ermination plan liability payable out of t he plan assets [*2] prior to allocation of assets under Section 4044of T itle IV. You also as ked what rate of int erest, if any, should be paid. We understand that the amount of intere st payable isprese ntly being adjudicated. We shall await the Court's decision regarding this issue. Final ly, you asked in w hat manner the benefits should be paid. The benefits should be paid in accordance with the plan d ocument. W e hope this is of assistance. Henry Rose Ge neral Counsel
-
Opinion Letter 75-32
Assets intended to fund insurance company annuities, but which are retained by the plan are subject to allocation procedures.
-
Opinion Letter 87-11
Plan assets must be allocated in succession to the benefits described in each of the six priority categories established by statute.
-
Opinion Letter 76-70
Discusses mechanics of converting defined benefit plan to an individual account plan.
-
Opinion Letter 83-22
Excess assets do not revert to the plan sponsor.
-
Opinion Letter 77-160
Following plan terms, the plan may be charged for reasonable termination-related expenses for which the plan is responsible.
-
Opinion Letter 85-09
The purchase of participating group annuity contracts to satisfy all accrued benefits with a termination/reestablishment transaction of a plan is permissible.
-
Opinion Letter 78-2
Whether the language in a plan document providing for the reversion of residual assets to the employer complies with the law.
-
Opinion Letter 86-03
PBGC cannot approve a transaction that would allow an employer to recover excess assets without termination.
-
Opinion Letter 77-161
A proposal to allocate post termination gains in plan assets to increase a participant’s benefits is not permissible.